[conspire] CABAL in the time of Cholera^W SARS-CoV-2: March event cancelled

[paulz at ieee.org]

 Methinks thou dost protest too much.
The analogy to Y2K is far from perfect, but it shows one possible situation.
During the DotCom era, some people realized that there could be a serious problem when the calendar turns to 2000.  Other people said, "Nay, no big deal."
As others on this email thread have said, a fair amount of effort was put into addressing the Y2K problem.
Then after all of the New Year's parties, there were folks saying, "See.  I told you so.  Y2K was no big deal!"
Now in many ways, the human virus problem is much more complicated.  We don't know how it will play out.  But China did force people to change their behavior and the spread in China seems to be reducing.  And if Italians can be convinced to stay home and limit their social interaction to singing from their balconies, there is a reasonable chance that other people will heed the advice of the health department officials and maybe the spread can be not too much until better treatment and/or a vaccine is available.   

Maybe it's different in NYC.  Here, for the past couple weeks, I have gotten a steady stream of messages about this event and that event being cancelled.  Traffic on the streets is way down.

To some this is a game about numbers, but if one fatality is someone important to you, that is totally not acceptable.

    On Monday, March 16, 2020, 9:01:34 PM PDT, Ruben Safir <ruben at mrbrklyn.com> wrote:  
 
 
> So it fails in all these ways.
> 
> As for the theory that solving the Y2K problem made people under value
> the problem, as opposed to heading off the virus early,  I find that
> wholy unsatisfactory.  The Y2K problem really wasn't that complex. I
> have reviewed at NYU Dental School nearly all of the systems for Y2K
> bugs, and the time the only software to suffer from the Y2K problem was
> a clinical system that was already being replaced, because we outgrew
> it.  Alas, we had no cobol systems in our immediate control.  Regardless
> of that.  The Covid-19 virus actually is VERY complex, and presents a
> problem that the Y2K problem just didn't scale.  And the action that
> would have been needed to head it off would be truly draconian by
> comparision to any solutions for Y2K.  It was and does cut right to the
> core of our existence as a social species, tangles internation trade,
> international and domestic politics, making life and death decisions to
> isolate populations, media response, public expectations, civil
> liberies, medical research, etc etc.
> 
> The problems in a nutshell don't compare even in that narrow
> perspective.
> 
> 

One of the most interesting things about this, FWIW is that even in 1918
they produced a vaccination by October of 1918.  I'm not sure how long
they actually worked on it but it underscores, in my mind, that there is
NO DAMN WAY that a century later that it should take one year to work up
a vaccination.  And they got the vaccination prototyped and to mass
usage in about 30 days because they just cut through all the crap and
went straight for a cure and crossed their fingers.




Word of the day - Virtual :  Vitural museums, virtual school, virtual
synagauges...

I bet 10 Qumquates on the Star Fleet Captain...

_______________________________________________
conspire mailing list
conspire at linuxmafia.com
http://linuxmafia.com/mailman/listinfo/conspire
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://linuxmafia.com/pipermail/conspire/attachments/20200317/d516e620/attachment-0001.html>