[conspire] ss(8) (was: Re: Party with iproute2 like it's 1999)
Rick Moen
rick at linuxmafia.com
Fri Mar 13 12:47:57 PDT 2020
Quoting Ruben Safir (ruben at mrbrklyn.com):
> Your inability to use grep is not a reason to be stuck with such a
> complex and shitty program.
>
> REALLY '( sport = :80 or sport = :443 )'
>
> This is an example of the kind of thinking that makes a program like ss
> suck so much.
>
> That is my opinion. I learned the prinicple of KISS in the army where
> getting things done can save your life, and memorizing obscure syntax is
> a waste of time that prevents one from drinking at the Hassinda..
> or can get your killed in the battlefield.
You're giving the rough side of the tongue to someone who merely
expressed appreciation for a program feature that's not mandatory and
that nobody's forcing you to use (with or without the program itself)?
What sort of a dog-in-the-manger attitude is that, Ruben?
And, _also_, gratuitously accusing that person, a veteran sysadmin, of
holding his view solely on account of being unable to use grep? That's
really out of line. Don't be such a total asshole here, please. Buy a
little impulse-control, if you cannot grow some through personal
strength of character.
Saying 'That is my opinion' doesn't give you licence to go out of your
way to be a jerk. News flash.
If you prefer grepping program output from stdout, you remain fully able
to do so using either netstat or ss.
As it happens, I certainly have repeatedly experienced, in a critical
work environment, exactly the annoyance Michael speaks of, about false
positives in grepped output because you didn't have the glob or RE
exactly right. I think he has a good point, that it's a significant win
to have a suited-to-purpose output filtering feature built into ss --
leaving aside the separate system-performance pitfall Michael mentioned.
More information about the conspire
mailing list