[conspire] access to network drive - denies to root?

[Rick Moen]

Quoting tom r lopes (tomrlopes at gmail.com):

> https://assets.ctfassets.net/0lvk5dbamxpi/6jBxT5LDgMqutNK4mPTGKd/4fa27cb4a130bca3b48a10c9045b0497/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-02

Is this an elaborate way of saying 'Ruben, just use sftp'?

If so, sftp (a network protocol for browsing and retrieving files over
an ssh channel) is not very comparable to sshfs (a remote filesystem
operating over ssh transport).


Ruben:  I'm just catching up on this thread, but I have to tell you,
this is the first time I've encountered someone trying to deploy sshfs
in twenty years.  You may have a difficult time getting knowledgeable
help, for lack of significant numbers of users.

For the record, the last time I was obliged to use sshfs, on the VA
Linux Systems corporate network, I found it to be painfully,
unacceptably slow.

But anyway, as Michael pointed out, since you pointedly mounted the
filesystem with just one UID/GID and omitted the flag that would have
permitted others, you guaranteed this outcome.