[conspire] Numbers racket

[Ruben Safir]

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:17:39PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Ruben Safir (ruben at mrbrklyn.com):
> 
> > about 4.2 in our model, which we sort of knew before it got here.  Eh -
> > it is a very fugable number.
> 
> Deirdre and I were trying to figure out what you meant to say when you
> wrote 'fugable'.  I'll admit I'm not certain.  (Please note that I'm
> not mocking your typos; I really sometimes have parsing problems, and
> this is one such occasion.)
> 
You can make fun of them.  That is more than OK.  I am sorry I am not
clearer.  

Fungable?  Data that can be massaged for your own purposes?