[conspire] Internet Privacy: today's vote and measures to take

[Daniel Gimpelevich]

On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 19:26 -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> There's no reason why you shouldn't be.  The only question I raised is
> where you have it send all of its recursive queries.  I gather that
> you,
> like most people, outsource it to an ISP or other network-distant
> recursive nameserver.  What I suggested was instead to send them to a
> local nameserver under your control.

I'm pretty sure there's a way to have dnsmasq not serve up DNS at all,
but only DHCP, thus leaving Unbound to serve up DNS directly to your
DHCP clients.