[conspire] New TLD

[Rick Moen]

Quoting Ruben Safir (ruben at mrbrklyn.com):

> Oh - it wasn't original poetry.... bummer.

You're part of today's lucky 10,000!  (Ref: https://xkcd.com/1053/)
Enjoy Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog.  (Or, if you lack the sense to
recognise good recommendations when you see them, don't.)

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Dr.+Horrible's+Sing-Along+Blog


> I think the point about the TLD and root names are not valid though.

Let me help you:  Nobody was making a a 'point about the TLD and root
names', and you're probably confusing authoritative (which means
something in DNS) with 'valid' (which does not).


> Of course, I am not an expert.

[This is me not arguing.]


> [ruben at stat13 ~]$ dig is.watching.so.beware
[...]
> [ruben at stat13 ~]$  dig -x 162.252.205.148
> 148.205.252.162.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN   PTR     is.watching.so.beware.
[...]

And your point is...?

If you cleverly noticed that the rDNS for dig -x 162.252.205.148 returns
a TLD that is unrecognised by the root nameservers, well done on that,
sir!  But what's your point?