[conspire] Fwd: Ubuntu 6.10
Edmund J. Biow
biow at sbcglobal.net
Wed Dec 20 15:45:29 PST 2006
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:20:59 -0800
> From: Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com>
> Subject: Re: [conspire] Fwd: Ubuntu 6.10 [was Re: ... distro news]
> To: conspire at linuxmafia.com
> Message-ID: <20061218202058.GI14528 at linuxmafia.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Quoting Tony Godshall (togo at of.net):
>> I think for a lot of us, we'd much prefer a proper Free distribution
>> that gives us long term security. Call us bigots or enthusiasts, but
>> the truth is elsewhere, really.
> Even from the beginning, Ubuntu's installer has auto-enabled via
> /etc/apt/sources.list a package collection called "restricted"
> comprising available software under proprietary but redistributable
> licences. (This is in distinction to the Official Debian installer,
> which _asks_ you if you wish to enable access to "non-free" and
> "contrib" = packages that themselves are open source but depend on
> others that are proprietary, but with your answer defaulting to "no".)
> However, to my knowledge, it has never installed proprietary software
> by default before, which starting with Feisty+1, it will (NVidia and ATI
> accelerated video drivers, sundry winmodem drivers, Atheros madwifi, and
> an Intel 3945 wireless driver): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AcceleratedX
> Personally, I do think that "never installed by default, but available
> (only) by a specific act of will" is a pretty good general policy.
Some reasons so many Linux graybeards are able to get away with shunning
binary proprietary blobs is because:
1) They've been using 'nix for long enough to know what hardware works
best with GPL drivers and have a pretty good cache of that hardware.
2) They can compile their own kernel modules in their sleep so don't
really need to rely on some opaque binary quite as much.
3) They are seasoned CLI users who aren't interested in games or eye
candy like Compiz, which requires use of proprietary drivers. If I'm
using mutt or pine it doesn't really matter much whether I load nvidia,
nv or vesa.
However these seasoned users are only one chunk of the growing Linux
community. A lot of folks are trying desperately to migrate from
Windows for whatever reason and the learning curve is very steep. I've
been using Linux as my primary OS for a couple of years now and am still
pretty green, not exactly a Newbie, but I don't dream of electric sheep
either. Most of these new users want a distro that they can get working
for most of the things that they do in a reasonable amount of time.
Hence the popularity of the "easier" user-friendly distros. On
distrowatch Ubuntu is No. 1, followed by openSUSE, Fedora, MEPIS,
Mandriva & PCLinuxOS, all relatively easy to use Linux operating
systems. One of the factors driving adoption of Ubuntu is the
availability of EasyUbuntu and Automatix, tools to ease installation of
proprietary bits, and a damn site easier than following all the steps in
something like fedorafaq or some such.
The demand for an "evil inside" distro that doesn't even require
EasyUbuntu is so much that in the last 30 days the No. 10 download on
distrowatch is the very new Mint, a modified stripe of Ubuntu with all
the evil proprietary code incorporated in the distribution image. Here
is their latest realease announcement on DW:
"A new stable version of Linux Mint has been released: "Linux Mint 2.1,
code name "Bea", is out and available for download." Here is a brief
list of some of the changes since version 2.0: "OpenOffice 2.1;
mintDesktop, which adds a lot of desktop improvements; quick access to
the computer, home places and terminal; ability to delete files directly
without sending them to the trash; mintDesktop home folders; Beagle
search; Tomboy notes; network manager; mintWifi, the purpose of which is
to configure a wireless card without an Internet connection; tutorials
to install and configure WiFi cards; a collection of WiFi drivers to
support about 40 different wireless card models; RealPlayer was replaced
with MPlayer plugins with support for Quicktime, AVI, MPG and a lot of
other web content; Flash plugin was upgraded to version 9 Beta 2...."
Read the detailed release announcement for further information. "
If big distros like Ubuntu & openSUSE make it harder for people to do
what they want to do with their machines, they'll simply switch to other
flavors that they think are more accommodating like Mint.
You'll note that even with Mint when GPL programs have been able to
handle a niche reasonably well, the packagers are more than willing to
switch, witness the substitution of MPlayer for RealPlayer to support
Quicktime, AVI and MPG.
I've been exposed to the notion that if we all hang tough and refuse to
install binary proprietary blobs like Flash that will create more demand
for GPL alternatives and maybe more incentive for companies like
Macromedia to open up their programs. But I think reserving a role for
distros that rapidly increase Linux adoption also gives companies some
incentive to open up their hardware, programs and standards.
MACDONALDUS SENEX FUNDUM HABET. E-I-E-I-O. ET IN HOC FUNDO, NONNULLAS
BOVES DOMESTICAS HABET. E-I-E-I-O. CUM MOO MOO HIC, CUM MOO MOO IBI. HIC
UNA MOO, IBI UNA MOO, UBIQUE UNA MOO MOO. MACDONALDUS SENEX FUNDUM
More information about the conspire