[conspire] Re: RHL 9 Install problems
rhl at molecularsoftware.com
Thu Jul 10 13:37:10 PDT 2003
On 7/10/03, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> writes:
> Quoting Greg Dougherty (rhl at molecularsoftware.com):
> Anyhow, to recap: You have a whopping big hard drive. RH9 has problems
> installing onto it. You think it has an ext2 partition on it, but
> running _even_ the LNX-BBC 2.1's fsck.ext2 on it brings up a bogus (?)
> complaint of the partition being mounted.
I HAD an ext2 partition on it. I did another install, however, and this is my
hda 1: ~10 GB, NTFS
hda 2: 100 MB, ext3 /boot
hda 3: 2000 MB swap
hda 5: the rest ext3 /
It's a WD 40 "GB" HD, which means it holds ~40 billion bytes of data (NOT 40
I ran fsck -c -c on hda2, no problem. I ran it on hda5, it said "vdone" after
spending 20+ hours checking for bad blocks, then hung my machine. Control-c and
-D did nothing, neither did anything else, so I shut it down.
I have found that I can usually do a Custom Minimal RHL 9 install. I try to do
more than that, or try to do anything once I have install, and my computer goes
> Somehow (exactly how is a bit unclear from your posts), you got past
> that, and ran a 20-hour fsck.ext2 _with_ badblocks check on it (but
> running the non-destructive mode), again using the utility from the
> LNX-BBC. But it didn't terminate correctly, but rather put out an
> incomprehensible notice saying "vdone", and hanged.
> You also mentioned downloading the pseudo-low-level formatting utility
> and/or drive-diagnostic utility for your model hard drive, just in case
> the drive has problems. You didn't clarify whether you ran it.
I haven't run it. I don't have a bottable floppy at the moment.
> Man, what a mess.
That was my feeling, about a week ago. :-(
> I think we can _reasonably_ safely assume that the LNX-BBC disk you used
> is OK. Therefore, the fsck.ext2 you're using is OK, ditto. (Your CD
> drive could still have problems, but instances of subtly defective read
> operations from _two_ CDs would be an awfully big coincidence. It would
> have been slightly nicer to have not used that CD drive, e.g., by using
> the Tom's Root-Boot floppy instead, but never mind.)
> Since you have the LNX-BBC handy, you might want to use _it_ to see if
> it can make fresh, from-scratch filesystems on your hard drive, blowing
> away whatever RH9 created there. If that works, and ext2.fsck likes
> them, then you can do a fresh installation of RH9, and be happy.
> If LNX-BBC's mkfs.ext2 chokes on the drive, then we have to wonder about
> the drive itself.
How do I do that? What program do I use to make the partitions, and how do I
get RHL to install onto the already created partitions?
While we're on the subject of partitions, is there anyplace you can point me to
that gives a good discussion on reasonable ways to partition a large HD with
IOW, I'm a programmer. I want to download and play with the linux kernal. I
want to download, and fix some "bugs" (they piss me off) in Mozilla. I want to
download JBuilder and MySQL and do programming with both (including downloading,
installing, and playing with the biojava.org code tree). After reading the
first chapters of the RedHat Linux 9 Bible, I was thinking about creating the
following partitions and mount points:
2 GB /tmp
2 GB /var
8 GB /usr
5 GB /home
`8 GB / (i.e. it get's what's left over)
Is this reasonable for what I want to do? Is this overly complicated, and I
should just make one large partition? TIA, anyone.
> In the latter case, I'd try the drive utilities you downloaded. If that
> doesn't make the problem go away, then RMA (return) the drive to the
> manufacturer under warranty, and get a replacement.
> (If anyone else on the mailing list thinks I'm talking through my hat,
> or has other ideas, please do speak up. Thanks.)
>  In your shoes, I'd try it without badblocks checking, I guess: 20
> hours _is_ a heck of a long time.
I'm not doing anything else with the computer, and I'm happy to leave it running
all night long, if it will do me any good.
More information about the conspire